Articles & Videos
Trump Official Shrugs Off Epstein Victimsâ Fury Over Redaction Fail
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche couldnât care less about exposing the survivors of Jeffrey Epsteinâs abuse. Donât believe us? Listen for yourself. During an interview on Fox News Monday, Blanche was asked to answer for the thousands of redaction errors in the Department of Justiceâs latest release of more than three million pages of Epstein-related documents, which allegedly exposed the names of at least 100 survivors.âThese were reportedly women who were minors at the time, or havenât come out publicly yet,â said Fox Newsâs Laura Ingraham. âHow did those names slip through?ââYeah look, youâre right. I mean thereâmistakes were made by, you have really hardworking lawyers that worked for the past 60 days,â Blanche stammered. âThink about this, though, you have pieces of paper that stack from the ground to two Eiffel Towers.âWe knew that there would be mistakes, we put thatâI said that to the American people on Friday. Everything we did was to protect victims,â Blanche continued. âAnd what weâre talking about, by the way, is 0.002 percentâââBut it matters to them, right?â Ingraham chided. âIt should matter to them, it matters to me too. Absolutely,â Blanche said. Ingraham: Names of dozens of victims were left unredacted. These were woman that were minors at the time that have not come out publicly yet.Blanche: Mistakes were made pic.twitter.com/fhIUvGFHluâ Acyn (@Acyn) February 3, 2026The many excuses furnishing Blancheâs depraved attempt to downplay DOJ âmistakesâ just donât make sense. The Trump administration had far longer than just 60 days to review the documents, as the DOJ supposedly began the process of declassifying documents related to the investigation over a year ago. The Epstein Files Transparency Act was also passed more than 60 days ago, and the DOJ then missed the deadline to release the documents, claiming that it needed more time to make redactions. As for his claim that everything the DOJ did was to âprotect victims,â itâs clear that the DOJ cared a lot more about protecting someone else. Nearly 40 nude photos of women, possibly underage, were mistakenly released uncensored, while an innocuous photo of President Donald Trump somehow was redacted.
You Wonât Believe the Righteous Language This Judge Used Against DHS
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administrationâs efforts to upend temporary protected status for more than 350,000 Haitians.In an unsparing 83-page decision issued late Monday, Judge Ana C. Reyes of the Federal District Court in Washington, D.C., formally denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit that challenges the Department of Homeland Securityâs attempts to terminate the TPS program entirely. Reyes didnât miss the opportunity to completely pick apart DHS and its leader, Secretary Kristi Noem, for doggedly pursuing a newfangled, anti-immigrant agenda even when it runs afoul of U.S. law. Reyes noted that Noem does not have the authority to unravel TPS, which was created by Congress through the Immigration Act of 1990. The judge further determined that Noemâs arguments for ending the program were not only flawed but also fundamentally unacceptable since they failed to address the economic component of the program.âShe ignores altogether the billions Haitian TPS holders contribute to the economy,â Reyes wrote.From the very first words of the ruling, Reyes frames Noem as the polar opposite of Americaâs first leader, George Washington, pitting one of her vitriolic tweets against a letter in which Washington insisted that the U.S. must receive âthe oppressed and persecuted of all nations and religions.ââSecretary Noem complains of strains unlawful immigrants place on our immigration-enforcement system. Her answer? Turn 352,959 lawful immigrants into unlawful immigrants overnight,â Reyes wrote. âShe complains of strains to our economy. Her answer? Turn employed lawful immigrants who contribute billions in taxes into the legally unemployable.âShe complains of strains to our healthcare system. Her answer? Turn the insured into the uninsured,â the judge continued. âThis approach is many thingsâin the public interest is not one of them.âUltimately, Reyes concluded, Noem does not have the law or facts on her side and, as a result, has done little more than âpound the tableââwhich, in this case, is the social media platform X.âKristi Noem has a First Amendment right to call immigrants killers, leeches, entitlement junkies, and any other inapt name she wants,â Reyes stated. âSecretary Noem, however, is constrained by both our Constitution and the APA to apply faithfully the facts to the law in implementing the TPS program. The record to-date shows she has yet to do that.â
French Authorities Summon Elon Musk to Court in X Child Porn Probe
Elon Muskâs lewd image generator on his X platform has gotten him into trouble in France.Prosecutors in Paris have asked Musk, along with former X CEO Linda Yaccarino, to appear for questioning over the spread of deepfake pornography and antisemitic content on the social media platform. The summons came after the prosecutorâs cybercrime division, along with Europol and the cybercrime units of the French police, searched Xâs offices in the city Tuesday.X is under investigation for criminal offenses such as complicity in the possession and distribution of âchild pornography images,â violating personal rights with its generation of âsexual deepfakes,â the denial of âcrimes against humanity,â and allegedly extracting data fraudulently from an automated processing system, the prosecutorâs office said.âThe voluntary interviews with the managers should enable them to explain their position on the facts and, where applicable, the compliance measures envisaged,â the prosecutorâs office said in a statement. Yaccarino and Musk have been summoned to appear in Paris court the week of April 20.While authorities in Paris have limited, if any, powers to compel Musk to appear in court, the move is a significant step against one of the worldâs leading social media platforms. Musk has faced heavy criticism over Xâs image-generation tool, which has allowed users to undress people using AI, even minors. X has also gained the reputation of being a haven for antisemitic content ever since Musk took over the platform. Could this be the first time Musk and X face accountability?
Trumpâs U.S. Attorney Sparks MAGA Backlash After Threat to Gun Owners
U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirroâs antiâSecond Amendment declaration has left the Trump administrationâs own base outraged.âYou bring a gun into the District [of Columbia], you mark my words: Youâre going to jail. I donât care if you have a license in another district, and I donât care if youâre a law-abiding gun owner somewhere else,â Pirro said on Monday, flying in the face of years of gun rights activism from Republicans and organizations like the NRA. âYou bring a gun into this district, count on going to jail and hope you get your gun back. And that makes all the difference.âPirro: "You bring a gun into the District, you mark my words, you're going to jail. I don't care if you have a license in another district and I don't care if you're a law abiding law owner somewhere else. You bring a gun into this District, count on going to jail and hope you⌠pic.twitter.com/tiZ6PwtA1iâ Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 2, 2026Pirroâs statement caused a flurry of backlash from the right, as registered gun owners in America are over two times as likely to vote for Republicans.âI bring a gun into the district every week, @USAttyPirro. I have a license in Florida and DC to carry. And I will continue to carry to protect myself and others,â GOP Representative Greg Steube wrote on X. âCome and Take it!ââJeanine Pirro threatening to arrest people for carrying in DC, even if they are law-abiding and licensed, shows how broken and out of touch these gun laws are. Unacceptable and intolerable comments by a sitting US attorney,â the National Association for Gun Rights wrote on X. âThis is why we need Real Constitutional Carry nationwide. Bureaucrats act like the 2A does not exist and brag about jailing people for exercising their rights.âThe blowback continued. âConcealed Carry Permit holders are statistically some of the most law abiding citizens in societyâeven more law abiding than police,â Gun Owners of America commented. âWe ARE NOT the problem.â Pirroâs comments are particularly confusing due to her recent support for less restrictive gun laws in the district. Just last summer, the Trump administration attempted to loosen concealed carry laws. And in December, the DOJ sued the D.C. government on the grounds that its gun restrictions violated the very Second Amendment Pirro is now attacking. âThe GOP Leadership is doing everything it can to keep second amendment voters from showing up in November,â said conservative commentator Erick Erickson.
Top Trump Official Insists Itâs âNot a Crime to Partyâ With Epstein
The Trump administration is running out of excuses to explain away the presidentâs relationship with deceased child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told Fox News Monday evening that pretty much everyone who partied with the âpedophile islandâ operator was off the hook. But in a pitiful attempt to brush off public backlash to the thousands of times that Donald Trumpâs name was mentioned in the Justice Departmentâs latest release of the Epstein files, Blanche practically resorted to gaslighting.âIs there any chance that any of these individuals who partied with Epstein and engaged with relations with minors will be prosecuted?â asked host Laura Ingraham.âIâll never say no,â Blanche said. âAnd we will always investigate evidence of misconduct.âBut as you know, it is not a crime to party with Mr. Epstein. Itâs not a crime to email with Mr. Epstein. Some of these men may have done horrible things, and if we have evidence that allows us to prosecute them, you better believe we will. But itâs also the kind of thing that the American people need to understand, that it isnât a crime to party with Mr. Epstein.â âIt didnât look like that was all that was going on in some of those photos,â pressed Ingraham. âI mean, if the photos could speak, some of them look pretty bad.ââThatâs right, and unfortunately photos canât speak, and so we need witnesses,â Blanche responded.Trump was mentioned more than 38,000 times in the latest batch of Epstein files, according to a New York Times review of the DOJâs Friday document dump, which consisted of some three million previously unseen pages.All in all, Trump was flagged in more than 5,300 files in the document cache, according to the Times.On Sunday, Blanche told CNNâs State of the Union that the DOJ reviewed the files last summer but did not find credible evidence against the president warranting further investigation.
Epstein BOMBSHELL Reveals DISASTER For Trump
Venture Capitalists Are Using Profits From Genocide to Fund AI-Powered Weapons
Arms makers are teaming up with venture capital firms in a push to bring AI to the battlefield.
Two CBP Agents Identified in Alex Pretti Shooting
The two federal immigration agents who fired on Minneapolis protester Alex Pretti are identified in government records as Border Patrol agent Jesus Ochoa and Customs and Border Protection officer Raymundo Gutierrez.